Monday, January 28, 2008

Robobuilder


People wrote about Behrokh Khoshnevis’ awe-inspiring, rapid-prototyping “robo builder” in 2005 when it was still a work in progress. But now, the University of Southern California professor’s contour crafting machine will be put to the test; it’s scheduled to erect its first house in California within the next few months. The two-story house will built in less than 24 hours out of only concrete and gypsum — and without the help of a single human hand. Khoshenevis’ groundbreaking robo-builder has caused some raised eyebrows and dropped jaws within the architectural community, as the machine provides a new model for construction that drastically cuts building timelines, material, manpower, and most importantly, waste and carb emissions.

Friday, January 25, 2008

Fictional Products


This is an excellent article with lots of good links. Raises some good questions about design research.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Sunday, January 20, 2008

TEKNION


MarketPlace System designed by Carl Gustav Magnusson for Teknion.



The aluminum truss is manufactured by a stage company (in the Czech Republic?)

The color of the inner structure is called 'Aircraft Primer'.

Clean Lines.


Assembly testing.


Ready to be shipped.

Trays in District System.

CEO with a butterfly on his shoulder.

Joe Almeida, Director of Panel Production and our tour guide.

"It's all about making money."


Bread and butter production of panels for cubical systems.

Automatic Welder.

Filler wire for automatic welder.



Coming from the oven, ready for powder coating.


Going back into the oven ?

Gear Cleaner.


Bread and butter.

Bread and butter.

Bread and butter.



Shipping truck ready to be filled.

Product at work.






400 or so factory floor workers, the most coming from Sri Lanka, then China, then Portugal.


Sunday, December 23, 2007

Yves Behar in OLPC video

I don't want to infringe any copy rights law, so here's the video site

I am still very curious on exactly what kind of research was done for this project that led to this decision and this design. Why is it that after several generations of evolution of this project, the design language remains very similar? If they(the various design firms that were contracted to do the jobs) are given very strict direction that ultimately will result in similar designs, why even bother getting different firms to do it? Why does it always look like toys that we, people on this side of the world, give to our kids? Is this the language that they should be able to relate to, or are we just pushing our solution onto their problems? Well, the more detail this project is revealed, the more question I have.